Cybereinforce Threat Enforcement
Intelligence that acts before the click lands.
Most protection answers one question: has someone already reported this? That is exactly the question an attacker's brand-new infrastructure passes. Cybereinforce combines curated intelligence with signals that exist from the very first minute of an attack: how old a domain is, what it imitates, and how it behaves. Every verdict comes with the reason attached.
How we turn intelligence into response
One loop, running continuously, in every protected browser.
Collect
Curated indicators of compromise from our analysts, from customer-submitted reports that we review, and from live observation of phishing and malware infrastructure.
Verify
New indicators are reviewed by people before they reach the shared feed. Whitelists and false-positive clean-ups keep the feed trustworthy, not just large.
Enforce
Each navigation is checked in real time against the feed, your own rules, and behavioural detections. Malicious destinations are blocked in the browser.
Respond
Blocks are logged with the exact reason, surfaced to your SOC, and can be exported to your SIEM. Every decision is reviewable and reversible by your administrators.
What we detect
Layered, because no single signal catches everything. Every check runs in real time, in the browser, before the page loads.
Curated indicator feed
Malicious domains, URLs and IPs, matched at full-URL precision, so a single bad path doesn't condemn a whole legitimate site.
Newly registered domains
Domains registered recently are blocked on first sight, before anyone has had the chance to report them. Details and the full TLD list are below.
Brand-lookalike domains
Domains that imitate well-known brands and services are recognised by structure and then corroborated with age, certificate and page evidence before being blocked.
Credential & device-code phishing
Fake sign-in pages, "shared file" lure chains and fraudulent device-login flows, patterns with almost no legitimate use.
Algorithmically generated domains
Machine-generated, throw-away domain names on cheap or shared hosting are flagged by their shape.
Compromised-site abuse
Legitimate sites hijacked to serve lures, such as password-reset abuse on compromised web installations, are recognised by behaviour.
High-risk TLD controls
Block whole top-level domains that your organisation has no business with, with your own list, enforced in real time.
Device Code Attacks
The Microsoft device-code sign-in page that attackers abuse to steal sessions is blocked by default for every customer. See how it works.
Newly-registered-domain protection
Attackers register fresh domains because fresh domains have no reputation. A domain minutes old is unknown to every blocklist, every reputation service and every DNS filter. The registry's own registration date is the one signal that exists from second one, so we read it.
How it works
- When someone opens a site, we look up when its domain was first registered, straight from the registry record where one is published.
- Domains registered within the last 12 months are blocked by default. This is deliberately stricter than the roughly 30-day norm in the industry; your administrators can whitelist legitimate young domains, such as your own new projects.
- Where a registry publishes no registration date, certificate-transparency history adds an extra signal: a domain whose first public certificate is recent is treated as new.
- Blocks rest on evidence, a confirmed registration date, so legitimate established sites are left alone and false positives stay low.
- Shared-hosting platforms and internal names are excluded, because the age of the platform says nothing about an individual page on it.
More than 1,100 TLDs watched
Domain-age protection covers every generic TLD (.com, .net, .org and more than a thousand newer ones such as .xyz, .top, .online and .shop) and 146 country-code TLDs, so the fresh domains attackers favour are covered wherever they register them.
Look up a TLD
Measured 2026-10-05 against live registrations. We keep extending coverage as registries publish more data.
Country-code TLDs with domain-age protection (174)
Generic TLDs with domain-age protection (1035)
Registry records are complemented by certificate-transparency history for additional registries, and every other detection on this page applies to all domains regardless of TLD.
Detection to response
A block is only useful if your team can understand it, act on it and undo it.
The reason, every time
Each block records why it happened: a known indicator, a young domain, a lookalike, a lure pattern, or one of your own rules. No unexplained risk scores.
SOC telemetry & audit trail
Block events and administrative changes are logged and exportable, for investigations and for audit evidence.
Your rules come first
Your own allow and block rules override shared intelligence. Whitelist a legitimate site once, globally or per organisation, and it stays allowed.
Built for Microsoft environments
Designed to complement Microsoft Defender and Sentinel, turning the threat intelligence you already have into enforcement at the browser. See integrations.
Customer-submitted intelligence
Enterprise customers can submit indicators they encounter. Our analysts review each one before it joins the shared feed.
Every auto-block feeds our intelligence
When a young domain, a lookalike or a machine-generated name is blocked in a customer's browser, it is queued for our analysts with the reason attached. Confirmed threats join the shared feed and protect every customer.
Analysts in the loop
Automation finds candidates; people confirm what becomes shared intelligence, which is how we keep false positives low.
See it on your own traffic
Start a trial, or talk to us about how threat intelligence, detection and response fit your environment.
Start Free Trial Device Code Attacks Contact us Trust Center* Some country-code registries do not publish a domain creation date. For these TLDs, newly-registered-domain detection is performed through background checks, such as certificate-transparency history, rather than a registry date lookup, and is provided on a best-effort basis.